Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has plummeted following recent attacks on tankers, raising concerns over shipping safety in the vital waterway.
New Delhi, India Jul 9, 2026 ALN: Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has fallen steeply after a series of tit-for-tat strikes by the US and Iran following an attack on three tankers earlier this week.
Just 23 tankers and cargo ships crossed the critical Gulf waterway on Wednesday, according to the maritime intelligence firm Kpler, down from 47 from a week before.
The three ships that were struck this week were using a US-recommended route through Omani waters. Iran has repeatedly said the only "safe" route is a separate route through its waters.
For decades, vessels have been given free passage through the strait, through which more than a fifth of the 's oil and gas supplies, as well as fertilizer shipments and other vital goods, flow.
Before the conflict began, an average of 138 ships crossed through the strait each day, according to the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC), a multinational maritime group including the US.
After the US and Israel launched their first strikes on Iran on February 28, this number fell to just a handful of ships per day.
Iran effectively closed the strait by attacking ships attempting to cross and laying mines, while the US responded with a blockade on all shipping to and from Iranian ports.
A deal to end the war, which was signed on June 17, included steps to reopen the strait. Washington also agreed to lift its naval blockade and ease sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
Following the agreement, overall traffic levels in the strait did initially increase to a peak of 72 ships on June 24.
Throughout its negotiations with the US, Iran has insisted it has the right to control movement through the strait and introduce fees for ships to pass.
The US and its Gulf allies, as well as governments in Europe and Asia, oppose this and say passage through the strait must return to being free and open as it was before the conflict began.
After the deal to end the war, the Iranian government set out a system of lanes through the north of the waterway close to the Iranian coast, which it said all traffic must use.
"The only safe route for the passage of commercial ships and oil tankers in the strait is the route determined by the Islamic Republic of Iran," Iran's top military command, Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, reiterated after this week's ship strikes.
After the deal was signed, the JMIC recommended instead that ships take a different route through Omani waters in the south of the strait.
The number of ships using this Omani route grew to a peak of 28 vessels on June 25, Kpler's data shows, overtaking the number of transits via the Iranian route.
Then on June 25 and 27, two ships in Omani waters were struck, with Iran warning all vessels to only use its approved routes.
President Donald Trump accused Iran of a "foolish violation" of its truce, and the US military conducted strikes on Iranian targets.
Iran, in turn, accused the US of violating their interim deal and said it had struck targets linked to American forces in the region.
The number of ships transiting via the Omani route initially slumped following the strikes, before continuing at a lower level than before.
The attacks on three ships this week have led to a slump in the number of vessels using the US-recommended Omani route.
All three ships—a Qatar-owned liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker, a Saudi-owned crude oil tanker, and a Liberia-flagged crude tanker—were crossing the strait close to the Omani route when they were attacked.
After the incidents, the number of vessels using the Omani route through the strait has ground to a halt, according to Kpler.
No ships used it on Wednesday, falling from just three ships the day before. The number had averaged about 10 a day in the week before the latest attacks.
Martin Kelly, senior intelligence analyst at security firm EOS Risk Group, believes the current round of strikes will follow a familiar pattern to the last.
"There will now be a bit of back and forth between the US and Iran before they make friends again; shipping will peak and trough cautiously until Iran attacks another ship and the cycle starts again," he said.
The memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between Iran and the US on June 17 committed Tehran to use "its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days."
It also said Iran would "conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz."
Tehran said these parts of the deal give it control over the strait, but critics noted there was no commitment from Iran to honor free passage on a long-term basis.
"The MOU was vague, particularly on issues surrounding the Strait of Hormuz," said Jennifer Parker, a maritime security expert at the University of New South Wales, "but even on a generous reading, it does not permit Iran to attack civilian shipping in Omani waters."
Concerns about sea mines laid by Iran in the internationally recognized shipping lanes used before the conflict have also played a part in holding traffic back from its pre-war levels.
On Thursday, Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a statement through its affiliated agency saying that "foreign powers have no claim to this land or to the Strait of Hormuz."
It went on to warn that "any interference in determining shipping routes" would "provoke a crushing response" and "seriously disrupt the gradual reopening process."
Speaking at the NATO summit on Wednesday, US President Donald Trump said the memorandum of understanding was "over," but negotiations between Iran and the US could continue.
Iran has also accused Washington of violating the agreement after it revoked a US Treasury license that had temporarily eased sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
"The US had clearly hoped that the generous, some would argue overly generous, financial incentives in the deal would discourage Iran from using shipping in the Strait of Hormuz as leverage. It will now need to rethink that approach," said Parker.
"Neither the promise of economic relief nor the threat of military punishment has, so far, changed Iran's behavior.
"The challenge remains finding the right balance between the carrot and the stick," she said.
Additional reporting by Joshua Cheetham
To learn more about the latest developments in Global Economy, stay updated with our exclusive reports and analyses on AiLensNews.
