HYC Criticizes Residents Safety and Security Act for Failing Indigenous Protection

Shillong, India Jul 19, 2026 ALN: The Hynñiewtrep Youths’ Council (HYC) has reiterated that the Residents Safety and Security Act, 2016 does not protect the indigenous people of the state. This statement comes against the backdrop of ongoing discussions about the rights and protections afforded to the indigenous population of , a state in northeastern India known for its rich cultural heritage and diverse ethnic communities.

The HYC, a prominent youth organization in , has long been an advocate for the rights of the indigenous Khasi people. In recent years, there has been an increasing concern regarding the influx of migrants and the impact this has had on local communities. The Residents Safety and Security Act, which was enacted in 2016, was intended to address some of these concerns by regulating the movement of people into the state. However, the HYC argues that the Act falls short in providing adequate protection for indigenous residents.

“If you say that MRSSA, 2016 is enough, show us which sections state that an outsider coming into has to register himself or a section which makes the facilitation centre a statutory entry and exit gate with power to register names of people entering our state,” HYC President Roy Kupar Synrem said during the 12th anniversary celebration in Laitarted, Nongthliew. This statement highlights a critical point of contention regarding the Act: its lack of enforceable provisions that would require non-residents to register upon entering the state.

Synrem alleged that the government is misleading people by claiming the 2016 Act is sufficient. He expressed concern that without a clear mechanism for registration, the Act does not effectively safeguard the interests of the indigenous population. He further questioned the legal framework of the Act by asking, “under which section a person refusing to give details could be prosecuted.” This raises significant questions about the enforcement capabilities of the Act and its overall efficacy in protecting local communities.

In addition to the shortcomings of the Residents Safety and Security Act, Synrem pointed to the need for the implementation of the Inner Line Permit (ILP) in the state. The ILP is a form of travel document required for Indian citizens to enter certain areas in northeastern states, including Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, and Nagaland, aimed at protecting indigenous populations from the influx of outsiders. “If the government cannot implement ILP in , then the 2020 amendment Bill should be enacted,” he said. The ILP has been a longstanding demand of various indigenous groups in , who believe it is essential for protecting their land, culture, and resources from external exploitation.

The call for the ILP is rooted in a historical context where indigenous communities have faced challenges from migration and settlement patterns that threaten their traditional ways of life. The northeastern states of India have unique demographics, with a significant portion of the population belonging to indigenous tribes. The demand for the ILP is not just about regulating migration; it is also about asserting the rights of indigenous peoples to maintain their cultural identity and control over their ancestral lands.

The HYC president also flagged concerns over state projects, alleging they are being given to outside companies while local youth are left to “look in envy” or take up jobs as security guards. This sentiment reflects a broader frustration among indigenous communities regarding economic opportunities and the perceived marginalization of local talent in favor of external entities. The issue of employment is particularly poignant in a state where unemployment rates can be high, and many young people are seeking job opportunities that allow them to stay close to their homes and communities.

“Our youths have to leave their homes and look for jobs in other parts of the state,” Synrem said, questioning whether the government wants state youth to only work as security guards while outsiders accumulate wealth. This highlights a critical socio-economic issue facing many indigenous communities in , where the benefits of development projects appear to be disproportionately favoring non-local companies and workers. The frustration over job opportunities is compounded by the fact that many young people in the region possess skills and qualifications that could be better utilized in local industries.

The implications of these concerns are significant. The HYC's criticisms of the Residents Safety and Security Act and the demand for the ILP reflect a broader struggle for self-determination and recognition of indigenous rights in . As the state continues to develop and attract investment, the balance between economic growth and the protection of indigenous cultures and communities remains a contentious issue. The HYC's stance resonates with a growing movement among indigenous groups across India, who are increasingly vocal about their rights and the need for protective legislation.

Moreover, the dialogue surrounding these issues is not limited to alone; it resonates throughout the northeastern region of India, where various ethnic groups are grappling with similar challenges. The movement for greater protections for indigenous populations is part of a larger narrative about identity, belonging, and the rights of marginalized communities in a rapidly changing socio-economic landscape. The experiences of indigenous groups in can serve as a case study for other regions facing similar issues, highlighting the need for tailored solutions that respect local contexts and histories.

In conclusion, the HYC's criticisms of the Residents Safety and Security Act, along with their calls for the implementation of the ILP, underscore the urgent need for a comprehensive approach to safeguarding the rights of indigenous peoples in . As discussions around these issues continue, it is crucial for the government to engage with local communities and address their concerns in a meaningful way. The future of indigenous rights in hinges on the ability of the state to balance development with the preservation of its rich cultural heritage and the well-being of its people. This balance is not only vital for the indigenous populations but also for the overall social cohesion and stability of the region.