The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) claims the Supreme Court's recent order contradicts government promises regarding FIRs against student protesters, calling it unacceptable.
Chandigarh, India Jul 29, 2026 ALN: The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has expressed strong disapproval of the Supreme Court's interim order that allows authorities to continue investigating FIRs registered during the nationwide student protests. The party argues that this order contradicts the assurances given by the government during negotiations that concluded the protests at Jantar Mantar. These protests, which were a response to various grievances among students, had garnered significant attention and mobilized large numbers of youth across the country, reflecting a broader discontent with governmental policies.
Chief spokesperson Saurav Das stated that the understanding with the government was that FIRs against protesters would be withdrawn. He emphasized, "The Supreme Court has now said that FIRs that were already registered will not be withdrawn. This is not what was discussed in our negotiations with the government." Das further stated, "Our understanding with the government was different, and we expect it to fulfill the assurances it gave us. The conditions being imposed by the Supreme Court are not acceptable to us." This situation has raised questions about the reliability of governmental negotiations and the extent to which student voices are being heard in the political arena.
On social media platform X, Saurav Das urged that the Supreme Court should not be politicized for the government's gains, asserting that its orders should not be weaponized against genuine protesters. He stated, "The Supreme Court cannot be politicised for the government’s gains. Its orders cannot be weaponised to achieve those gains. A solemn guarantee was given before the nation. Those ought to be honoured. All FIRs ought to be withdrawn." This statement reflects a growing concern among various political groups and civil rights advocates about the potential misuse of judicial power in political matters.
Das added that if any criminals were found among the protesters, the police should take action through legal procedures instead of using FIRs to target others. He insisted, "If criminals roamed, police must apply for cancellation of bail in their old cases. Must also answer why they were roaming so freely in society. But the government can’t use this excuse to pursue FIRs so it can later target genuine protesters." This highlights a critical point regarding the distinction between legitimate protest and criminal activity, emphasizing the need for due process in addressing grievances while safeguarding the rights of protesters.
He asserted that the youth would not accept such actions and reaffirmed that the CJP would continue to support protesters who participated in the movement. This commitment to solidarity among the youth indicates a potential for sustained activism and mobilization, which may have implications for future political landscapes in the country.
The Supreme Court's interim order stated that no coercive action should be taken against student protesters without a criminal record in cases linked to the CJP protests. It ordered the release of eligible detained students, preservation of CCTV footage and other electronic evidence, and a fair investigation into the injuries suffered by both protesters and police personnel. However, the court did not order the withdrawal of existing FIRs and allowed investigations to continue. This partial concession has left many feeling that the Supreme Court has not fully addressed the concerns raised by the CJP and the broader student community.
Das mentioned that the Supreme Court’s order should be seen as an addition to the CJP’s demands and urged the government to honor its commitments made to the protesters. The implications of this order extend beyond the immediate context of the protests, as it raises broader questions about the relationship between judiciary and executive branches of government, especially in politically sensitive cases involving public dissent.
Das indicated that the CJP would launch another nationwide protest if the government failed to keep its promises. He stated, "We will launch a nationwide protest once again, as we remain committed to working in the best interests of students." This statement signals a readiness for escalation in the protests, which may lead to increased tensions between student organizations and the government. The potential for renewed protests could also galvanize other groups, leading to a larger movement advocating for student rights and freedoms.
CJP spokesperson Ashutosh Ranka also called on the Centre, particularly Union ministers JP Nadda and Jitendra Singh, to ensure that no charges were filed against protesters. Ranka demanded the immediate withdrawal of all FIRs, the release of detained students, and a commitment that no future cases would be filed against protesters by the Delhi Police or police in BJP-allied states. His warnings underscore the CJP's commitment to holding the government accountable for its promises and maintaining pressure on authorities to act in good faith.
He warned, "Failing which we will be forced to sit on protest again." Ranka emphasized that the government was expected to share a written agreement outlining the commitments made to the CJP, highlighting the importance of transparency and accountability in governmental negotiations with civil society organizations.
Earlier, the CJP reported receiving notifications from the Bihar and Assam governments withdrawing cases against protesters. They were also assured that no action would be taken against protesters in Rajasthan, according to Saurav Das. These assurances from state governments indicate a varying approach to handling protests across the country, with some states appearing more lenient and responsive to student demands than others.
Das concluded by reiterating the need for the government to honor its commitments, stating, "The deadline for the Government of India to honour its guarantees expires today." This statement serves as a critical reminder of the urgency of the situation and the potential consequences if the government fails to act. With the CJP poised for further action, the political landscape surrounding student protests may continue to evolve, reflecting the ongoing struggle for rights and representation among youth in the country.
To learn more about the latest developments in Political Controversies, stay updated with our exclusive reports and analyses on AiLensNews.
